I think that this online tool is extremely convenient and easy for students (and teachers) to use. It is quite intuitive, and you can save it onto the mindmup website or as a google doc. It is easy to change the colors of the boxes and add new boxes, as well as arrange them as you'd like. There is also an option to insert pictures straight into the mind map, although I did not experiment with that feature. You can also collapse a node if you want to temporarily hide a section (for example, the subnodes of Trig if the students haven't learned it yet). One concern with this tool is how cluttered the map looks if there is too much information. I would encourage the students not to write paragraphs for each node. There is also a limit to the movement of each node. You are unable to make a new section vertical, so the child node has to be on the outer (left or right) side. I am unsure as to whether the curved lines connecting the nodes are a pro or a con. I think that straight lines can look kind of harsh, but these lines seem a little juvenile to me.
Monday, June 29, 2015
Literacy Web Tool Modeling
I started experimenting with a website called mindmup.com which allows you to easily make mind maps. What I like about mind maps is the fact that it organizes all your thoughts and allows you to be as simple or complex as you would like. You can have a simple looking web, with only a few topics on it, or get as detailed as possible with tons of information. Using this website, I made a quick mind map of the different math topics that can be used as references for math teachers and students. I think that I would encourage students to make this mind map in their trig class so that they can see all the math that they have accomplished in the past few years as a student. I would also consider using this for an individual class (i.e. Geometry or Algebra) as a way to get students thinking about reviewing topics. Remembering the topics they covered is the first step to get them to actually review those topics :)
Friday, June 19, 2015
Maryland Teacher Technology Standards
The Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) has
released a list of seven standards and outcomes for the Maryland Teacher
Technology Standards. Below, I have
listed ways of how I plan to address these standards in my classroom.
I.
Information Access, Evaluation, Processing and
Application: Access, evaluate, process and apply information efficiently and
effectively.
Organization, categorization, and storing information can be difficult in
a classroom. I think that I would have
multiple ways to store all my information, data, and work for the class. I would have a hard copy of the paperwork, an
electronic copy stored on my computer and a flashdrive/external hard drive, and
an online version, like a dropbox. Each
class would have a separate section, and that would have different folders for
each unit. There would also be a
separate section for resources used for GT students, ELL students, etc.
II.
Communication:
a.
Use technology effectively and appropriately to
interact electronically.
To collaborate with peers, parents, administrators, and experts, I would
use multiple forms of communication. I
would have a blog to share information with colleagues, as well as use sites
such as twitter and pinterest to share articles, posts, etc. I would have a class website to share
information about the class with my students and parents. There are also programs that are created to “text”
parents and students information and homework assignments without sharing the
teacher’s phone number. I would also use
Google Docs and surveymonkey to collaborate and share information, have sign
ups for field trips, etc.
b.
Use technology to communicate information in a
variety of formats.
I would use sites like YouTube to share videos for a flipped classroom
approach. I also would use sites such as
Blackboard or Moodle, if they were supported by my school.
III.
Legal, Social, and Ethical Issues: Demonstrate
an understanding of the legal, social, and ethical issues related to technology
use.
It is important that with the use of technology in the classroom,
students understand the legal and ethical issues. Before introducing technology in my
classroom, we would have a lesson on the negative outcomes of using technology,
as well as discussing the importance of citing all work. There would also be a section of this in
syllabus, talking about the class rules of using the Internet (don’t share
personal information, don’t post anything that is inappropriate, etc.). It is also important to have consequences for
the students if they break this rule, as well as to enforce these consequences.
IV.
Assessment for Administration and Instruction:
Use technology to analyze problems and develop data-driven solutions for
instructional and school improvement.
I would use online programs, as well as programs like Excel to track
student’s progress throughout the year.
I think that it is important to have an understanding of both an
individual’s progress, as well as the progress of the class as a whole. I would look at the averages for assessments
and break down the scores by question. There
are online tools such as Socrative.com that allow teachers to create a
quiz. They can watch in real time as
students take the quiz, as well as the percentage of questions that the student
got right, and the percentage of the class that got each individual question
right. This information can be applied
to the modification of the lesson plans, both for that year and in the future.
V.
Integrating Technology into the Curriculum and
Instruction: Design, implement, and assess learning experiences that
incorporate use of technology in a curriculum-related instructional activity to
support understanding, inquiry, problem solving, communication, and/or
collaboration.
Using technology such as Chromebooks, iPads, etc. students will be able
to take a variety of assessments to allow teachers to understand the progress
of students. It is important for
teachers to try out this technology before introducing students to it. There’s nothing worse than having students go
to a website to complete an assignment, only to find out that the website is no
longer there or has been modified drastically.
Using WebQuests, students will be able to work with each other and be in
charge of their own learning. An
interest survey could be given at the beginning of the year to obtain
information on the preferred methods of media and technology for the class.
VI.
Assistive Technology: Understand human equity
and developmental issues surrounding the use of assistive technology to enhance
student learning performance and apply that understanding to practice.
Work with professionals in the school to determine resources for students
that need assistance. Allow students
that need it to use online resources that help them with their individual
learning needs. Find out the most
efficient resources, as well as monitor the students and their progress- help
out as needed.
VII.
Professional Growth: Develop professional
practices that support continual learning and professional growth in
technology.
Explore professional organizations such as the International Society of
Technology in Education (ISTE), research any new technology that seems relevant
to the class. Attend conferences and
training opportunities in the summer, collaborate with teachers in my own
department, as well as other STEM departments.
I
believe that classrooms should have technology integrated into the lesson, but
not solely use technology. I think that
there is a balance between using no technology and using too much technology
and as STEM teachers, we have to find that balance. Technology can be used a tool to promote literacy. Through the use of WebQuests, online articles,
and online books, students can work on their literacy together in a positive
setting. However, if the students are
not technologically literate, it can be difficult to successfully complete
these tasks. Instructions are a huge
part of literacy and it can be difficult to write a set of directions if
students are not literate in technology terms.
Monday, June 15, 2015
Webquest
I found this webquest online and would use it in an Algebra
class. I have tutored a lot of students
in Algebra and one of the hardest things that they learn is Order of
Operations. It can be difficult to
grasp, and although we use the phrase “Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally” to
help them with the order, it is still a difficult concept for them. It takes a lot of practice before any student
can truly master the art of Order of Operations.
I was a little apprehensive trying this webquest out. I have found that most webquests in the past
are trying too hard to be fun and while their content is aimed for a higher
level audience (i.e. high school), they make the target audience seem as though
they are in elementary school. This
webquest was no exception. The author
added a bunch of clip art pictures and cartoons. While they brightened up the website, I felt
as though the target audience was for a fifth grader.
On the top left side of the website, there are sections for
the introduction, tasks, process, evaluation, conclusion, etc. While clicking on tasks, the author is quick
to introduce PEMDAS. One of my biggest
disappointments with teaching it using the Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally
phrase is that it doesn’t show that the multiplication and division operations
(as well as addition and subtraction) are done at the same time, in order from
left to right. The author actually
presented this information well, and showed that you do multiplication and
division together, as well as addition and subtraction.
A concern that I did have was that at the bottom of the
tasks page, there was a link straight to the game. I started playing the game for awhile before
I even realized what the assignment was supposed to be. To fix this, I would probably create my own
directions. The evaluation section was also empty. Once you get into the “game”
you are given 10 questions. You must
click on the correct operation to perform.
Once you click on the correct operation, they rewrite the equation with
the completed operation. For example,
with a simple expression like 4+2x3, the first operation would be 2x3. Once clicked on, a green checkmark would
appear next to the 4+2x3 expression and underneath, the expression 4+6 would
appear. Once 4+6 was clicked on, the
answer 10 would appear and the user could start the next question.
I do like that the student does not actually have to perform
the operation, but simply identify which operation must be completed. When learning a new skill, it can be
distracting to have to do something else.
If you had a problem like 4534x398+2, it can be very time
consuming to take 453 to the fourth power and then multiply it by 398. By the time you’re done with that, you will
probably forget to add the 2. By simply
clicking on the correct operation, the student can understand the skill without
getting flustered by doing the arithmetic.
Saturday, May 30, 2015
Mitosis and Meiosis Lesson Plan Evaluation Rubric
Below is a link to a Evaluation Rubric for a presentation in the Mitosis and Meiosis Lesson Plan that was written in ED 605. Students were split into groups of three or four and asked to make a presentation on either Mitosis or Meiosis using Prezi, PowerPoint, Glogster, etc.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14YbdHGx4m9yyC4ZwIikzpNmkWi0Yv7ydBHh1oWb_Gtc/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14YbdHGx4m9yyC4ZwIikzpNmkWi0Yv7ydBHh1oWb_Gtc/edit?usp=sharing
Sunday, May 24, 2015
Standardized Testing Reflection
I have been taking standardized tests my whole
life. I started by taking MSAs (Maryland
State Assessments) and HSAs (Maryland High School assessments). The MSAs were given every year from third to
eighth grade to measure reading and math achievement. The HSAs were given for Algebra I (which I
took in 7th grade), Biology (9th grade), American
Government (9th grade), and English (10th grade). It is mandatory to pass the HSAs in order to
graduate from high school in Maryland. These
standardized tests measure the progress of both the school and the student. (MSDE, 2003).
I took the SATs during my junior year of high school, as well as many AP
(Advanced Placement) exams my junior and senior year. I took the two separate English APs, AP
Statistics, AP Calculus AB, AP U.S. History, AP Calculus BC, Physics C:
Mechanics, and Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism. Recently, I have taken the PRAXIS II in
Mathematics.
Having taken so many standardized tests, I have often
wondered how effective they were in evaluating my learning. Despite the intentions of the test makers, I
do not believe that many, if any, of these exams successfully demonstrated my “evidence
of learning.” Popham (2014) discusses
evidence of student learning as “evidence in the form of student performance on
classroom tests.” Most of the tests that
I took focused on more on how well I could memorize and recall information and
not on my understanding of the topic. I
think that the SATs and the HSAs were rather ineffective in measuring my
understanding. The AP exams had a lot of
writing and places to explain my reasoning, and therefore I feel as though they
were more effective in correctly measuring my performance.
I think that standardized testing was made to measure
student progress on a “fair” playing field.
It ended up being shaped into what it is today because it is currently
being used to assess schools. (D’Agostino,
Welsh, & Corson, 2007) Currently, a
teacher’s competence is being determined by how well their students perform on standardized
tests. (Popham, 2014) School funding is often heavily influenced on
the school’s overall performance on standardized testing. It isn’t necessarily a way to evaluate students
and show evidence of student learning, it is a way to evaluate the teachers and
the schools. When I was younger and
taking standardized tests, I often wondered if my scores would truly affect me
or just the school five years down the road.
I think that the Common Core Standards are trying to bring the focus of
teaching and standardized testing back to how the students are performing and emphasizing
student learning and not on the teachers.
By holding students to the same standards, students will learn more
effectively and be more prepared for their lives. Common Core has changed some of the standards
in hopes to do that. While it is only
implemented in Mathematics and English, I am speculating that Common Core will
be introduced to the sciences shortly.
References:
D‘Agostino,
J. V., Welsh, M. E., & Corson, N. M. (2007). Instructional sensitivity of a
state’s standards-based assessment. Educational Assessment, 12(1), 1-22.
Maryland
State Department of Education (2003). Testing
Content and Data. Retrieved from http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/testing/testing_overview.htm?WBCMODE=PresentationUnpublished%252%25%25%25%3E%25
Popham, W. James. (2014). Classroom assessment: what teachers need to
know. Pearson Education, Inc.
Monday, May 18, 2015
Grouping Students
Grouping students is a difficult task in the
classroom. There are many methods for
doing so and some are more effective than others. There are teachers that allow students to pick
their own groups. This is almost always
an ineffective method, as students will generally choose their friends and be
very distracted. The two main grouping
strategies are heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. Both groupings can be effective in different
situations.
Homogeneous groups are pairings of similar
students. This can be helpful when students
are beginning to apply their learning to projects. At this point, I would place students who
were struggling together so that I could focus some extra attention on
them. Higher ability students will be
able to accomplish more of their own tasks on their own without my help.
Heterogeneous groups would be beneficial during
brainstorming activities. With different
background knowledge and experiences, a heterogeneous group would be able to
bring a variety of perspectives to the task.
If students all had the same background, new ideas would not be
introduced to the group.
Another benefit of heterogeneous groups is that peer
learning is introduced. By pairing a
struggling student with a student who excels, it could go one of two ways. First, the struggling student could learn
from the other student. This can help
the teacher who may not have time to assist all of the struggling students in
the class. The other option is that the
struggling student does not do any work and it all falls on the high ability
student. It is not “fair” for the high
ability student to get a lower grade because of another student. Having peer evaluations would discourage
students from slacking off. Pairing
heterogeneous groups together could also develop reading and writing
skills. By doing paired reading,
students will be able to practice their literacy skills.
For my ED 605 unit, I would vary the grouping of the
students. This would eliminate possible
conflicts that would arise if a group member did not put forth the effort that
the rest of the group did.
Monday, May 11, 2015
Framing our Reading Part 4: Vocabulary and Concept Development
Concept
|
Text Link
|
Rationale for Choosing
|
Text Frame (s)
|
Strategies Used (and Resource)
|
Biodiversity
|
|
This article discusses
the changes in biodiversity due to climate.
|
Concept/Definition
|
Power Notes (Buehl)
|
Bacteria
|
|
This article describes
a bacteria cell's replication and how it identifies its DNA from an enemy
cell.
This article draws
on past knowledge and relates bacteria cells to Biology and the real world.
|
Goal/Action/Outcome
Making Connections
|
K-W-L (McLaughlin
and Buehl)
|
Atoms
|
|
This article
combines math, biology, chemistry, and engineering to show how new
discoveries can revolutionize technology.
This article explores nanometer-sized pieces of gold and their
electronic changes. This can help make
new discoveries in bioimaging and sensing.
|
Concept/definition
Compare/contrast
|
Connection
Stems (McLaughlin)
|
For this week in Framing our Reading, my partner Samantha
and I were to revisit the previous three weeks’ articles and choose a key term
from each of the articles. We chose
Biodiversity from the most recent article, Bacteria from Week 2, and Atom from
the first week. Now that we chose the
terms, we each decided on a graphic organizer to teach these terms.
The graphic organizer that I chose was the semantic map
(McLaughlin, 2015). McLaughlin suggest
using Semantic Maps to “activate prior knowledge, introduce content-specific
vocabulary, and organize information about a topic.” Semantic Maps are simple to both use and
teach. The steps for completing a map is
as follows:
1)
Pick a word you don’t know from the text.
2)
Write this word in the middle of a piece of paper and
draw an ellipse around it.
3)
Make a list of words and phrases related to the target
word.
4)
Group items from the list into categories. Connect this category to the target word and
list the items from the list under the category.
An example of biodiversity for two of the terms is shown in
the picture above. I like that there is
a lot of brainstorming involved in this type of graphic organizer. I also like that it encourages students to
think outside of the box and make connections to previous knowledge. I am not a pro at using this graphic
organizer, as I would much rather make a list like I did with the Power notes
from week 3. I sometimes found it
difficult to come up with an appropriate category and would have preferred if
the categories were given to me. I don’t
believe this graphic organizer works with all types of vocab, but I believe
that it is an extremely useful tool for visual learners. I also like that there is not much necessary
planning involved and a teacher can quickly tell students to make a Semantic
Map for a vocabulary word that might come up in the middle of a lesson.
To see these words being used with a different graphic
organizer, check out my partner Samantha’s blog
post.
Work Cited
Buehl, D., (2014) Classroom
Strategies for Interactive Learning, 4th ed. International Reading
Association.
Weizmann Institute of Science. (2015, April 13). How a
bacterial cell recognizes its own DNA.ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 18,
2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150413130825.htm
Uppsala Universitet. (2015, April 16). Studying how
climate affects biodiversity. ScienceDaily.
Retrieved April 20, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150416132038.htm
McLaughlin, M. (2015). Comprehending Content Area Text.
In Content area reading: Teaching
and learning for college and career readiness (2nd ed., pp. 57-62). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Suomen Akatemia (Academy of Finland). (2015, April 10).
How many gold atoms make gold metal?. ScienceDaily.
Retrieved April 11, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150410083516.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)