Below is a link to a Evaluation Rubric for a presentation in the Mitosis and Meiosis Lesson Plan that was written in ED 605. Students were split into groups of three or four and asked to make a presentation on either Mitosis or Meiosis using Prezi, PowerPoint, Glogster, etc.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14YbdHGx4m9yyC4ZwIikzpNmkWi0Yv7ydBHh1oWb_Gtc/edit?usp=sharing
Saturday, May 30, 2015
Sunday, May 24, 2015
Standardized Testing Reflection
I have been taking standardized tests my whole
life. I started by taking MSAs (Maryland
State Assessments) and HSAs (Maryland High School assessments). The MSAs were given every year from third to
eighth grade to measure reading and math achievement. The HSAs were given for Algebra I (which I
took in 7th grade), Biology (9th grade), American
Government (9th grade), and English (10th grade). It is mandatory to pass the HSAs in order to
graduate from high school in Maryland. These
standardized tests measure the progress of both the school and the student. (MSDE, 2003).
I took the SATs during my junior year of high school, as well as many AP
(Advanced Placement) exams my junior and senior year. I took the two separate English APs, AP
Statistics, AP Calculus AB, AP U.S. History, AP Calculus BC, Physics C:
Mechanics, and Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism. Recently, I have taken the PRAXIS II in
Mathematics.
Having taken so many standardized tests, I have often
wondered how effective they were in evaluating my learning. Despite the intentions of the test makers, I
do not believe that many, if any, of these exams successfully demonstrated my “evidence
of learning.” Popham (2014) discusses
evidence of student learning as “evidence in the form of student performance on
classroom tests.” Most of the tests that
I took focused on more on how well I could memorize and recall information and
not on my understanding of the topic. I
think that the SATs and the HSAs were rather ineffective in measuring my
understanding. The AP exams had a lot of
writing and places to explain my reasoning, and therefore I feel as though they
were more effective in correctly measuring my performance.
I think that standardized testing was made to measure
student progress on a “fair” playing field.
It ended up being shaped into what it is today because it is currently
being used to assess schools. (D’Agostino,
Welsh, & Corson, 2007) Currently, a
teacher’s competence is being determined by how well their students perform on standardized
tests. (Popham, 2014) School funding is often heavily influenced on
the school’s overall performance on standardized testing. It isn’t necessarily a way to evaluate students
and show evidence of student learning, it is a way to evaluate the teachers and
the schools. When I was younger and
taking standardized tests, I often wondered if my scores would truly affect me
or just the school five years down the road.
I think that the Common Core Standards are trying to bring the focus of
teaching and standardized testing back to how the students are performing and emphasizing
student learning and not on the teachers.
By holding students to the same standards, students will learn more
effectively and be more prepared for their lives. Common Core has changed some of the standards
in hopes to do that. While it is only
implemented in Mathematics and English, I am speculating that Common Core will
be introduced to the sciences shortly.
References:
D‘Agostino,
J. V., Welsh, M. E., & Corson, N. M. (2007). Instructional sensitivity of a
state’s standards-based assessment. Educational Assessment, 12(1), 1-22.
Maryland
State Department of Education (2003). Testing
Content and Data. Retrieved from http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/testing/testing_overview.htm?WBCMODE=PresentationUnpublished%252%25%25%25%3E%25
Popham, W. James. (2014). Classroom assessment: what teachers need to
know. Pearson Education, Inc.
Monday, May 18, 2015
Grouping Students
Grouping students is a difficult task in the
classroom. There are many methods for
doing so and some are more effective than others. There are teachers that allow students to pick
their own groups. This is almost always
an ineffective method, as students will generally choose their friends and be
very distracted. The two main grouping
strategies are heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. Both groupings can be effective in different
situations.
Homogeneous groups are pairings of similar
students. This can be helpful when students
are beginning to apply their learning to projects. At this point, I would place students who
were struggling together so that I could focus some extra attention on
them. Higher ability students will be
able to accomplish more of their own tasks on their own without my help.
Heterogeneous groups would be beneficial during
brainstorming activities. With different
background knowledge and experiences, a heterogeneous group would be able to
bring a variety of perspectives to the task.
If students all had the same background, new ideas would not be
introduced to the group.
Another benefit of heterogeneous groups is that peer
learning is introduced. By pairing a
struggling student with a student who excels, it could go one of two ways. First, the struggling student could learn
from the other student. This can help
the teacher who may not have time to assist all of the struggling students in
the class. The other option is that the
struggling student does not do any work and it all falls on the high ability
student. It is not “fair” for the high
ability student to get a lower grade because of another student. Having peer evaluations would discourage
students from slacking off. Pairing
heterogeneous groups together could also develop reading and writing
skills. By doing paired reading,
students will be able to practice their literacy skills.
For my ED 605 unit, I would vary the grouping of the
students. This would eliminate possible
conflicts that would arise if a group member did not put forth the effort that
the rest of the group did.
Monday, May 11, 2015
Framing our Reading Part 4: Vocabulary and Concept Development
Concept
|
Text Link
|
Rationale for Choosing
|
Text Frame (s)
|
Strategies Used (and Resource)
|
Biodiversity
|
|
This article discusses
the changes in biodiversity due to climate.
|
Concept/Definition
|
Power Notes (Buehl)
|
Bacteria
|
|
This article describes
a bacteria cell's replication and how it identifies its DNA from an enemy
cell.
This article draws
on past knowledge and relates bacteria cells to Biology and the real world.
|
Goal/Action/Outcome
Making Connections
|
K-W-L (McLaughlin
and Buehl)
|
Atoms
|
|
This article
combines math, biology, chemistry, and engineering to show how new
discoveries can revolutionize technology.
This article explores nanometer-sized pieces of gold and their
electronic changes. This can help make
new discoveries in bioimaging and sensing.
|
Concept/definition
Compare/contrast
|
Connection
Stems (McLaughlin)
|
For this week in Framing our Reading, my partner Samantha
and I were to revisit the previous three weeks’ articles and choose a key term
from each of the articles. We chose
Biodiversity from the most recent article, Bacteria from Week 2, and Atom from
the first week. Now that we chose the
terms, we each decided on a graphic organizer to teach these terms.
The graphic organizer that I chose was the semantic map
(McLaughlin, 2015). McLaughlin suggest
using Semantic Maps to “activate prior knowledge, introduce content-specific
vocabulary, and organize information about a topic.” Semantic Maps are simple to both use and
teach. The steps for completing a map is
as follows:
1)
Pick a word you don’t know from the text.
2)
Write this word in the middle of a piece of paper and
draw an ellipse around it.
3)
Make a list of words and phrases related to the target
word.
4)
Group items from the list into categories. Connect this category to the target word and
list the items from the list under the category.
An example of biodiversity for two of the terms is shown in
the picture above. I like that there is
a lot of brainstorming involved in this type of graphic organizer. I also like that it encourages students to
think outside of the box and make connections to previous knowledge. I am not a pro at using this graphic
organizer, as I would much rather make a list like I did with the Power notes
from week 3. I sometimes found it
difficult to come up with an appropriate category and would have preferred if
the categories were given to me. I don’t
believe this graphic organizer works with all types of vocab, but I believe
that it is an extremely useful tool for visual learners. I also like that there is not much necessary
planning involved and a teacher can quickly tell students to make a Semantic
Map for a vocabulary word that might come up in the middle of a lesson.
To see these words being used with a different graphic
organizer, check out my partner Samantha’s blog
post.
Work Cited
Buehl, D., (2014) Classroom
Strategies for Interactive Learning, 4th ed. International Reading
Association.
Weizmann Institute of Science. (2015, April 13). How a
bacterial cell recognizes its own DNA.ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 18,
2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150413130825.htm
Uppsala Universitet. (2015, April 16). Studying how
climate affects biodiversity. ScienceDaily.
Retrieved April 20, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150416132038.htm
McLaughlin, M. (2015). Comprehending Content Area Text.
In Content area reading: Teaching
and learning for college and career readiness (2nd ed., pp. 57-62). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Suomen Akatemia (Academy of Finland). (2015, April 10).
How many gold atoms make gold metal?. ScienceDaily.
Retrieved April 11, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150410083516.htm
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Framing our Reading Part 3: Extending Thinking
|
Text Citation or Link
|
Rationale for Choosing
|
Text Frame(s)
|
Strategies Used and Resource
|
Extending Thinking Example
|
|
This article discusses
the changes in biodiversity due to climate.
|
Concept/Definition
|
Power Notes (Buehl)
|
Power Notes are a form of outlining. They can also be paired with Concept Mapping
for a more in depth comprehension. This
technique gives students a way to systematically look for relationships within
the text. While similar to outlining,
this strategy is simpler for students.
Power Notes visually display differences between main
ideas and supportive information. Main
ideas are assigned a power rating of 1. Details, as well as examples are given
a power rating of 2, 3, or 4.
Generally, the form for power notes is shown as below.
Power 1 = Main idea
Power
2 = Detail/Supportive information for Power 1 (above).
Power
3 = Detail/Supportive information for Power 2 (above).
Power
4 = Detail/Supportive information for Power 3 (above).
At the introduction of this strategy, students should
be given the power 1 category. After
students become familiar with this strategy, they can begin to determine the
categories on their own.
There are many advantages to this strategy. It is an excellent reviewing technique. Students also learn to reread to prioritize main
ideas. They can be integrated with many
other strategies and help show how information is connected.
I have completed Power Notes for the article listed
above:
1. Climate Change
2.
Impacts species occurrence and distribution
3.
species population fluctuates
2.
Ice Age
3.
Cyclical number swings coincide with ice age
3.
ice age
4.
compressed distribution
4.
falling numbers
3.
No ice age
4.
expanded species
1. Human influence on Climate Change
2.
Humans modify and destroy environments and habitats
3.
Cause decrease in population
2.
Humans upset natural cyclical number swings
3.
numbers are pushed past “tipping point” for eventual extinction
Not all articles work well with Power Notes. I like the idea of having an outline and
rating the importance of the information with main ideas and supporting
ideas. I think that if we had chosen a
longer article, there would be a little more meat to this strategy, however the
benefits are obvious with this particular technique. To explore this article using the
Quick-Writes strategy, please visit Samantha's
blog.
References:
Buehl,
D., (2014) Classroom
Strategies for Interactive Learning, 4th ed. International Reading
Association.
Uppsala
Universitet. (2015, April 16). Studying how climate affects biodiversity. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April
20, 2015 from www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150416132038.htm
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Framing our Reading Part 2: Guided Thinking using KWL
|
Text Citation or Link
|
Rationale for Choosing
|
Text Frame(s)
|
Strategies Used and Resource
|
Guided Thinking Example
|
|
This article describes a bacteria cell's replication and how it identifies its DNA from an enemy cell.
This article draws on past knowledge and relates bacteria cells to Biology and the real world.
|
Goal/Action/Outcome
Making Connections
|
K-W-L (McLaughlin
and Buehl)
|
The KWL and KWLS Comprehension Strategy is a classic
practice that allows students to combine and organize their knowledge, both pre
and post reading, as well as add to it during the reading. It allows students to synthesize information
to form a visual aid. This can be used
as a study tool, or just a way to organize thoughts. A KWL chart is beneficial because it has
students think about prior knowledge, sets a purpose for the unit, allows a
teacher to assess what the student learned, and shows teachers what their
students interests are.
The
KWL chart has 3 columns, the KWLS chart has a 4th column to it. The chart looks like the following and can be
handed out as a template.
TOPIC:
|
||
K
|
W
|
L
|
The K Column refers to the question “What do I know?” Here, students list everything they know
about the topic. This could include words,
terms, or phrases associated with this particular topic. This encourages students to make a connection
to their past.
The W Column refers to the question “What do I want to
know?” This is an important step because
it begins to frame the reading and encourages the students to think about what
the purpose of reading this text is. It
makes the student think a little deeper than just the superficial questions
asked at the beginning of the text.
The L Column is filled with answers to the question “What
have I Learned?” This is filled out
after the reading and discusses what the student has learned from the
text. Some teachers prefer to have
students fill this out during the reading, which I agree has merit. A student can forget a lot by the end of a
reading. Ideally, the L Column should
answer most of the questions from the W Column.
The fourth, and optional column is S, which stands for
“What do I still want to know?” Students
are encouraged to put unanswered questions from the W Column to this
column. They may also add questions that
were developed from the reading.
I was excited to try out the K-W-L technique, because it’s
basically just a bunch of lists and I happen to love lists. I think that the KWL chart is a good way to
organize your thoughts and think critically before, during, and after the
reading.
TOPIC: Bacteria cells and how they
recognize their own DNA
|
||
K
-
Single celled organisms
-
Many different kinds
-
Can cause disease
-
Reproduce through division (Called fission maybe?)
-
Can duplicate itself quickly
|
W
-How
do they recognize their own DNA?
-
Is a single celled organism’s DNA different than a human’s?
-
In what situation would a bacteria cell need to tell the difference between
its DNA and another cell’s DNA?
|
L
-Bacteria
have an immune system, fight off invasive viruses called phages
-immune
system called CRISPR “remembers” past encounter so it can defend against
similar future attacks
-“Chi
sites” are uncommon in viral genomes, but common in bacterial genomes, acting
as a self marker
|
After completing the reading using the KWL technique,
I was surprised by how much I gained by using the technique, as opposed to just
reading the article straight through. I
have not taken a biology class or studied cells since my freshman year of
college and I was not confident that I would take away important information
from the article. By using the KWL
technique, I not only was able to remember some very minor facts about
bacteria, but I was able learn a lot more than expected. I like that each entry into the L Column is a
short little summary of the article.
I am a bit concerned with some aspects of this
comprehension technique. First of all,
it is a lot of work prior to reading the actual article. I have concerns that the students might get
distracted and or bored before a teacher even gives out the article. My second concern is that while I was reading
the article, there were times where I was just reading to fill out the third
column and not reading to learn and comprehend.
I do like that after completing the chart, one can
look back and have a nice summary of the article and their learning
process. Furthermore, teachers can look
at the chart and easily assess what the student learned and took away from the
article.
To explore this article using a different technique,
check out the Hands
on approach by Samantha.
References:
McLaughlin,
M., (2015). Content Area Reading: Teaching
and Learning for College and Career Readiness. Boston: Pearson.
Buehl,
D., (2014) Classroom Strategies for
Interactive Learning, 4th ed. International Reading Association.
Weizmann
Institute of Science. (2015, April 13). How a bacterial cell recognizes its own
DNA. ScienceDaily. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150413130825.htm
Sunday, April 12, 2015
Framing our Reading: Part 1 (Engagement)
|
Text Citation or Link
|
Rationale for Choosing
|
Text Frame(s)
|
Strategies Used and Resource
|
Engagement Example
|
This article
combines math, biology, chemistry, and engineering to show how new
discoveries can revolutionize technology.
This article explores nanometer-sized pieces of gold and their
electronic changes. This can help make
new discoveries in bioimaging and sensing.
|
Concept/definition
Compare/contrast
|
Connection
Stems (McLaughlin)
|
The
Connection Stem Strategy provides a way to help students make connections with
their prior knowledge and the texts.
Students can associate the current reading with other readings as
well. The basis of this reading
comprehension strategy is to make connections so that students can reflect on
their reading. Connection Stems can be
used for narrative and informative text and be used at any time during the
reading (pre-reading, post-reading, or during).
Students
read the text and make connections to the real world, their own life, or other
text using Connection Stems, or a phrase to begin a connection. McLaughlin suggests the following Connection
Stems:
- -That
reminds me of…
- -I
remember when…
- -I
have a connection…
- -An
experience I have had that was similar to that…
- -I
felt like that person when…
- -If
I were that person, I would…
Students
will individually think of Connection Stems with the article being read and
write them down. After reading and
reflecting, they could share it with their neighbors. You can also specify the type of connections
that you would like the students to focus on: text-self, text-text, or
text-world.
While
reading the gold atoms article, I focused on my own Connection Stems. “I have a connection with observing
electronic properties because I studied electrical engineering in college.” “I remember when we studied molecule and atom
behavior in material science and how it affects electronics.” “Using this in short-term energy storage
reminds me of an article we read in my renewable energy class about how
difficult it can be to store power.”
While my own Connection Stems are mainly related to my experience with
Electrical Engineering, students will be able to create their own connection
stems to their current and past classes, as well as past knowledge from outside
of school.
Works Cited:
Akatemia,
Suomen (Academy of Finland). (2015, April 10).
How many gold atoms make gold
metal? ScienceDaily. Retrieved April
12, 2015 from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150410083516.htm
McLaughlin, M., (2015). Content
Area Reading: Teaching and Learning for
College and Career Readiness. Boston:
Pearson.
Buehl, D., (2014) Classroom Strategies for Interactive
Learning, 4th ed. International Reading Association.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)